— Back to Blog
By Niels Kaastrup-Larsen & Richard Brennan | 22 March 2022 | Trend Following Update

Trend Following Performance Report — February, 2022

Trend Following Performance Report — February, 2022

Overview

As the US Equities continue to slip into negative territory, the Trend Following Fund Managers once again post a solid result for the month of February. This is now the third consecutive positive month for the TTU TF Index resulting in numerous high watermarks being achieved for the Trend Following Programs.

Is this the start of a glorious multi-decade performance result for the Trend Followers? We haven’t seen conditions like this since the 1970’s and 1980’s. With more than 3 positive consecutive years already under our belts, the memory of the tumultuous decade between 2010 and 2018 where trend following was declared dead is now turning into a distant memory.

But we don’t think of our performance in terms of fleeting moments of days, months, or years. Our performance is viewed through a looking glass of decades. This is the only timeframe to consider when seeking absolute returns over a trading career. Our diversified robust systems that always cut losses short and let profits run ensure that we will always be available when the opportunities arise.

We may never be able to predict the future, but we understand that our robust process will ensure that we are there to participate when the future decides it is time to deliver the Trend Follower their windfall. We may not win every trading battle, but we are very confident that we will win the trading war. So for all those pundits out there who have confidently stated that “Trend Following is dead”….

February 2022 Trend Performance Summary

February adds to the strong start in 2022 bringing a solid 3.15% increase for the TTU TF Index. The Calendar YTD total now sits at 4.8%. Not bad considering the -2.99% decline in the S&P500TR Index for the month and a YTD decline of -8.0% . Our non-correlated relationship with US Equity Indexes can offer distinct benefits at times.

The TTU Trend Barometer is also reflecting generally favourable trending conditions with a month-end reading of 55.

The Trend Barometer is a proprietary tool we use at TTU to assess the trend strength of a diversified portfolio consisting of 44 markets across all sectors. We firstly subdivide the trend strength of each market of a hypothetical diverse portfolio into five ranges from strong up, medium up, neutral, medium down and strong down. We then aggregate these results into a single portfolio number which we use to describe the overall trend strength across a hypothetical Program portfolio.

We then arbitrarily divide this percentage range into 3 where a value of 0-30 is considered a very unfavourable market regime for trend following Programs, a range between 30 to 55 is a somewhat neutral environment for Trend Following Programs (but not an environment where you could expect consistent performance) and values more than 55 are considered to be a favourable regime towards Trend Following Programs, where they should see good performance.

This method is surprisingly powerful in describing CTA monthly performance and can be used to connect market trading environments to resultant Manager performance.

Monthly Market Wrap

The month started with positive employment news with the employment numbers exceeding the most optimistic economic projections, but after looking at seasonal adjustments the results came within expectations. Nevertheless, investors took the report as unambiguously positive news and just another reason for the expected increase in interests rates for March. The market is pricing in a 70% chance of a 50-basis point hike at the next meeting. The biggest news for the week was the massive drop in Facebook’s parent (Meta) share price contributing to further downside pressure on the S&P500 and Nasdaq. Facebooks drop was the biggest rout in history and equivalent to the GDP of a small country. Crude Oil also rallied which is likely to further pressure on the Fed’s policy settings.

Week two saw some great news with Alan Dunne, a co-host of the Systematic Investor Series announcing the arrival of a baby girl to the Dunne family, but that didn’t change the bearish views of the market with inflation clearly on the agenda. US Consumer prices increased at a rate not seen since the 1982. January CPI numbers came in far above expectations showing a rapid acceleration forcing the Fed to act fast. Treasury yields have reacted across the entire yield causing further short-term acceleration with medium to long term flattening. The yield curve is shaping up to reflect a contracting economy going forward. The dark clouds of a looming recession are starting to form. The dominant contributors to inflationary pressures were energies, goods related to vehicles, services tied to the pandemic, food prices and housing.

Week three continues to see fixed income markets in the forefront of the action. The short-term segment of the yield curve has priced in a 50-100 basis point increase. More urgency was expressed for more immediate policy changes to respond to the inflationary pressures. Geopolitical risks were also rising as Russia continued to encircle Ukraine with their war games. Warnings were being issued that it was likely that these war games would lead to a major invasion, yet many pundits believed that such tactics were just posturing attempts by Russia.

The final week of the month saw with horror the move by Russia to invade Ukraine. Our hearts go out to the brave Ukrainians who are doing their best in a dire situation. The dominant drivers of economic news immediately switched from inflation to conflict with uncertainty rising. Many of the commodities such as Wheat and Oil saw massive spikes as economic sanctions from the Western World rained down on Russia. The shock to capital markets saw a further drop in the S&P500 and a flight to safe haven assets.

March is shaping up to continue to be a very interesting month.

For a blow-by-blow description of what was moving for the month, then you can always listen to our weekly systematic investor series by clicking on the links below. It is worthwhile listening to our past catalogue as it provides you with an understanding of how these markets can shape the emotions of a Trader and why it is therefore essential that Trend Followers adopt systematic rules-based processes to keep these emotions in check.

Top Traders Unplugged Trend Following Index (TTU TF Index) Performance

Using the excellent and free public sources of Fund Manager return data provided by Nilsson Hedge we create a Trend Following Index comprising those Programs which meet our definition of Globally Diversified Systematic Trend Following Programs. To meet this definition a Program must be:

  • Geographically diversified across a broad array of asset classes that include soft commodities, energies, metals, bonds, fixed income, foreign exchange, and equities;
  • Fully systematic in nature using quantitative rules-based processes for entry and exit decisions;
  • Possess at least a 15-year unbroken track record up to the current month; and
  • Adopt Trend Following trading techniques as the dominant investment strategy within the Program.

Having identified those Programs that meet this definition, we then create an Index by monthly rebalancing with equal weighting and cheekily refer to it as the TTU TF Index. Our Index comprises a total of 60 Programs over the Performance monitoring period from 1 January 2000 to the current month of 28th February 2022.

For the period from 1st January 2000 to 28th February 2022, the TTU TF Index has produced a Compound Annual Growth Rate of 8.32% with a Maximum Drawdown of 18.38% (Refer to Chart 1). This compares very favourably against the performance of the S&P500 Total Return Index (includes dividends) which has produced a Compound Average Growth Rate of 7.03% with a Maximum Drawdown of 50.95% over the same period (Refer to Chart 2).

For the month of February 2022, The TTU TF Index increased by 3.15%. Alternative Trend Following Indexes (Refer to Chart 1) such as the Barclays Top 50 Index (BTOP50) and the Société Générale Trend Index (SG Trend Index) also experienced increases of 1.56% and 3.61% respectively for the month.

Chart 1 – TTU TF Index Performance

Chart 2– S&P500TR Index Performance

Top Traders Unplugged Trend Following Program (TTU TF Program)

You may have noticed that recently in the Systematic Investor Series I have been showcasing my proprietary system which I traded before my involvement with DUNN.  I have taken my listeners under the hood to better understand the thinking behind the design process of this trend following model in the following episodes:

We have continued to track the performance of this trend following model on an ‘after fee’ NAV basis simply to provide a context for my listeners to understand how the performance of this classic trend following model performs against other, perhaps more recent Trend Following Programs whose methods have ‘drifted’ away from the traditional Trend Following roots.

Despite a difficult drawdown period between May 2015 to Feb 2019, the TTU Trend Following model continues to perform strongly during market regimes that are more volatile and uncertain.

February saw a slight positive month of 0.86% which is a welcome contribution, albeit small, to the current Drawdown of approximately 16%.

Chart 3 – TTU TF Program Performance

Table 1 – TTU TF Program Monthly Returns

Top 10 Lists

We have prepared the following Top 10 lists for various performance categories based on monthly performance returns for the reporting period 1st January 2000 to 28th February 2022.

1.      Top 10 Listing – by Compound Annual Growth Rate

2.     Top 10 Listing – by Risk Adjusted Return (Serenity Ratio)

3.     Top 10 Listing – by Last 12 months Performance

Performance Results for the TTU Top 5 by Serenity Ratio

In a recent research project, we undertook at TTU, we examined three different allocation methods that could be deployed by an investor seeking to optimally allocate investment funds towards 5 of the Top ranked Globally Diversified Systematic Trend Following Programs with a long-term track record.

These three methods adopted 3 different forms of performance metric, namely:

  1. Top 5 Performers by Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) using a rolling lookback of 15 years.
  2. Top 5 Performers by MAR ratio (CAGR/Max Draw%) using a rolling lookback of 15 years.
  3. Top 5 Performers by Serenity Ratio using a rolling lookback of 15 years.

The findings of our project can be obtained by clicking on this link.

Our research determined that the optimal selection method was the Serenity Ratio method.

The Performance for the month of February 2022 of our Top 5 Selection Method using the Serenity Ratio was an increase of 1.04% bringing the prior 12 months return to a result of 5.43% (Refer to Chart 4). The ‘Serenity’ selection method continues to perform exceptionally well from a risk-adjusted perspective. For the entire reporting period, this selection method boasts a CAGR of 5.18% with a Maximum Drawdown of only 14.44% and effectively a “zero” correlation to the SRP500TR Index (-0.05).

Chart 4 – Performance Results of the Top 5 Allocation Method (Serenity Ratio)

The current selection of Top 5 Funds that have been recommended by this research for the investment period between 1st February 2022 and 31st January 2023 are as follows:

  • Man AHL: AHL Evolution;
  • Fort LP: Global Contrarian;
  • Fort LP: Global Trend
  • Salus Alpha Capital: Directional Markets (DMX); and
  • Man AHL: Alpha

Individual Performance Results for these 5 Programs used for the Serenity allocation as at 28th February 2022 are as follows:

Performance Results for the Alternative 60/40 portfolio using the TTU Top 5 by Serenity Ratio

In our “How to Invest with the Best” blog post, we also highlighted the significant improved risk-adjusted performance results that could be achieved by replacing the 40% allocation to Bonds in the traditional 60/40 portfolio with an allocation of 40% towards the TTU Top 5 by Serenity ratio.

The evaluation compared the performance of a traditional 60% Equity/40% Bond portfolio against a 60% Equity/40% Serenity portfolio to highlight the uncorrelated historical nature of this Alternative 60/40 portfolio and demonstrate the benefits that a sizeable allocation towards the Serenity portfolio would bring to an investor if equity and bond markets go back to their historic relationship and become more positively correlated in the future. There is no guarantee that correlations remain static over time and it is possible that bond markets and equity markets may lose their uncorrelated relationship that has existed in the last 20 years or so. It is far less likely that the TF managers within the Serenity Grouping will ever be strongly positively correlated to the Equities market, over the long run, given the extensive global diversification and ability to go long and short, that is present within the constituents of the Serenity Grouping.

Chart 5 below showcases the comparative performance results for the period 1st January 2000 to 28th February 2022 of:

  1. A 100% investment in the S&P500TR portfolio
  2. A 100% investment in the VBIAX which is a suitable proxy for the classic 60% Equity/40% Bond portfolio
  3. A 100% investment in a 60% S&P500TR 40% Serenity portfolio and
  4. A 100% investment in the Serenity Portfolio

Chart 5 – Comparative Performance Results of Various Portfolio Allocations

The comparison of alternative portfolio allocations above highlights the strong historic risk adjusted returns that have been enjoyed by 60% S&P500TR / 40% Serenity Composite Portfolio.

A more detailed assessment of this powerful 60/40 investment option is reflected in Chart 6 below.

Chart 6 – Performance Results for the 60% S&P500TR/ 40% Serenity Composite

Important Disclaimers

This document is directly solely to Accredited Investors, Qualified Eligible Participants, Qualified Clients and Qualified Purchasers. No investment decision should be made until prospective investors have read the detailed information in the fund offering documents of any manager mentioned in this document. This document is furnished on a confidential basis only for the use of the recipient and only for discussion purposes and is subject to amendment This document is neither advice nor a recommendation to enter into any transaction. This document is not an offer to buy or sell, nor a solicitation of an offer to buy or sell, any security or other financial instrument. This presentation is based on information obtained from sources that TopTradersUnplugged (“TTU”) (“considers to be reliable however, TTU makes no representation as to, and accepts no responsibility or liability for, the accuracy or completeness of the information. TTU has not independently verified third party manager or benchmark information, does not represent it as accurate, true or complete, makes no warranty, express or implied regarding it and shall not be liable for any losses, damages, costs or expenses relating to its adequacy, accuracy, truth, completeness or use.

All projections, valuations, and statistical analyses are provided to assist the recipient in the evaluation of the matters described herein. Such projections, valuations and analyses may be based on subjective assessments and assumptions and may use one among many alternative methodologies that produce different results accordingly, such projections, valuations and statistical analyses should not be viewed as facts and should not be relied upon as an accurate prediction of future events. There is no guarantee that any targeted performance will be achieved Commodity trading involves substantial risk of loss and may not be suitable for everyone

TTU is not and does not purport to be an advisor as to legal, taxation, accounting, financial or regulatory matters in any jurisdiction. The recipient should independently evaluate and judge the matters referred to herein. TTU does not provide advice or recommendations regarding an investor’s decision to allocate to funds or accounts managed by any manager (“or to maintain or sell investments in funds or accounts managed by any manager, and no fiduciary relationship under ERISA is created by the investor investing in funds or accounts managed by any manager, or through any communication between TTU and the investor

In reviewing this document, it should be understood that the past performance results of any asset class, or any investment or trading program set forth herein, are not necessarily indicative of any future results that may be achieved in connection with any transaction. Any persons subscribing for an investment must be able to bear the risks involved and must meet the suitability requirements relating to such investment. Some or all alternative investment programs discussed herein may not be suitable for certain investors This document is directed only to persons having professional experience in matters relating to investments. Any investment or investment activity to which this document relates is available only to such investment professionals. Persons who do not have professional experience in matters relating to investments should not rely upon this document.

This document and its contents are proprietary information of TTU and may not be reproduced or otherwise disseminated in whole or in part without TTU’s prior written consent.

This document contains simulated or hypothetical performance results that have certain inherent limitations AND SHOULD BE VIEWED FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES. Unlike the results shown in an actual performance record, these results do not represent actual trading. HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS HAVE MANY INHERENT LIMITATIONS, SOME OF WHICH ARE DESCRIBED BELOW. NO REPRESENTATION IS BEING MADE THAT ANY ACCOUNT WILL OR IS LIKELY TO ACHIEVE PROFITS OR LOSSES SIMILAR TO THOSE SHOWN IN FACT, THERE ARE FREQUENTLY SHARP DIFFERENCES BETWEEN HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS AND THE ACTUAL RESULTS SUBSEQUENTLY ACHIEVED BY ANY PARTICULAR INVESTMENT ACCOUNT.

ONE OF THE LIMITATIONS OF HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS IS THAT THEY ARE GENERALLY PREPARED WITH THE BENEFIT OF HINDSIGHT IN ADDITION, HYPOTHETICAL TRADING DOES NOT INVOLVE FINANCIAL RISK, AND NO HYPOTHETICAL TRADING RECORD CAN COMPLETELY ACCOUNT FOR THE IMPACT OF FINANCIAL RISK IN ACTUAL TRADING FOR EXAMPLE, THE ABILITY TO WITHSTAND LOSSES OR TO ADHERE TO A PARTICULAR TRADING PROGRAM OR OTHER ASSET.

There are numerous other factors related to the markets in general or to the implementation of any specific trading program which cannot be fully accounted for in the preparation of hypothetical performance results and all of which can adversely affect actual trading results. No representation is being made that any investment will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those being shown.